Vlad Baloșin

Authentic architecture is an exercise in constant transformation. A building is more than a static, rigid structure; it evolves, refining its relationship with the city and its people. For Vlad Baloșin, founder of METRIK Architecture, design means striking a balance between rigor, aesthetic sensitivity, and an understanding of the urban fabric. As the architect behind one of the most iconic projects in the northern part of the capital, WIN Herăstrău, he speaks of architecture as an investment in sustainability and relevance. 

Portrait of an architect – Vlad Baloșin

WIN Alliance: In your experience, what is the key distinction between an innovative project and one that stands out for its rigor and conservative—yet sound—principles?  

V.B.: I’ve thought a lot about this, considering my work over the past few years, but especially in light of what I’ve been able to accomplish as part of the WIN Herăstrău project. When you’re working on a project of this magnitude—when you feel that you’re responding to the needs of the area and housing trends, while also addressing issues specific to each space within the building—innovation no longer arises simply for its own sake, but out of the need to find ingenious solutions to real-world situations.

On the other hand, innovation—especially in a field like construction—is a concept with spectacular potential or, conversely, a dangerous one, if you don’t take all the necessary precautions into account. You may suddenly get the impression that you need to make multiple compromises on elements that would be better off remaining within a time-tested, user-friendly framework. Viable innovation, in and of itself, is very rare in the construction industry. It’s a field that has developed over time based on classic paradigms—and rightly so! True innovation—or what is specifically meant by that term these days—often comes from the realm of technology; that’s a key pillar driving creative development. Sure, it’s interesting—even appealing—to say, “Yes, we’re always innovating!” but the truth is that it’s very rare for tested elements and the way you reassemble them to be considered truly innovative. 

I don’t think it’s necessary to come up with something “forcedly innovative”; rather, it’s more important to come up with something appropriate to the context and the priorities of the community you’re addressing. The need for innovation can also stem from a need to satisfy one’s ego, and reining in that ego is important—it’s vital—when you’re dealing with the safety of those to whom you’re providing living spaces. 

Metrik Architecture team on the construction site of the WIN Herăstrău residential complex

WIN Herăstrău residential complex

WIN Alliance: Since we’re talking about aesthetics and how the neighbourhood or city where we live is developing—both in terms of long-term value and as an investment—what does the ideal city actually look like from architect Vlad Baloșin’s perspective?  

V.B.: I think I’d avoid using the term “ideal” and stick with “the city we want.” You have to set an ideal in your mind and try to work toward it, to achieve at least 60% of what you’ve set out to do, but for it to actually become an ideal city…? Hard to say! I see it first and foremost as a pedestrian-friendly city, and that has multiple dimensions. It’s not just a city defined by its urban landscape—sidewalks with green spaces and harmonious public areas at the base of buildings—but also a space of “islands” of greenery and nature that are public and bring people closer together. This could be the first aspect. Mobility is the next aspect, with an emphasis on pedestrian mobility, which must be strictly separated from vehicular traffic. This approach—featuring bike lanes, the widest possible pedestrian spaces, and reduced vehicle access—can be seen in Western Europe; it works very well, and I feel it should be implemented here as well.

Traffic, which is the city’s number one problem, is most easily solved by limiting car access and promoting an efficient public transit system, with pedestrian-friendly public spaces, squares, and spacious, safe transit stops. When we talk about the pedestrian dimension or the importance of pedestrians in the geometry of the city of the future, the urban scale must be considered in this way. From my point of view, urban planning in its current form isn’t the answer when it comes to “happy cities,” so to speak. But if I were to choose a model-city that comes to mind as an architect—Amsterdam, Barcelona—you realize that there are clear building regulations there, with high-traffic areas, cars separated from the “Rambla,” those pedestrian zones that bring people together—tourists and residents alike.  They have this “pedestrian-friendly” scale, with special attention paid to the ground floor level—creative and richly ornamented yet harmonious public spaces, plenty of parks, and plenty of playgrounds.  

Metrik Architecture team at the completion of the WIN Herăstrău residential complex

WIN Alliance: Between aesthetics, functionality, and sustainability, what values should guide contemporary architecture?  

V.B.: Contemporary architecture must address the site’s challenges and integrate the building into its context. Exactly how that’s done is up to each architect. You can choose to create contrast and play with the design in extraordinary ways, or you can create something organic, so the architecture doesn’t “scream” so loudly. I believe there are an infinite number of solutions for any given site, and each solution can offer something special. For example, here at Metrik Architecture, the design team always tries to start with a rather understated, measured approach and respond to a matrix of the pros and cons of the neighbourhood and the site’s location. We’re extremely careful in our approach, and based on our conclusions, we try to maintain as coherent a design direction as possible.

WIN Alliance: Do you feel that this need to hold back sometimes hinders architectural development? Or do you think it’s, on the contrary, a good thing?  

V.B.: It’s clearly a good thing, because there are so many factors to consider. It’s not just about fulfilling the need to create or come up with something new; you also have to provide the right solution, taking into account all the circumstances and everyone involved. Because there are investment considerations, there are psychological aspects of use, different users in every project, and there are the developer’s wishes—who may have a certain image in mind or be guided by a particular feeling when thinking about the building or space in question. We try to listen to all of these and come up with a solution that essentially serves as the common ground for as many constraints as possible. I sincerely believe that good projects emerge from many constraints.  

WIN Alliance: Has the profile of homebuyers changed over the past decade? What priorities and selection criteria define today’s buyer looking for a premium property? 

V.B.: The buyer’s profile has changed radically over the past 10 years! Before, it was all about location—that’s all we ever heard, that any apartment or building had to have a “premium location,” to be in a premium area of the city. That was all that mattered, and maybe (I say maybe!) they’d occasionally check to see who the developers were, but even that aspect wasn’t of much interest. Today, things are radically better— buyers research who the structural engineers are, but they also pay equal attention to the architecture, because there’s a certain prestige to be gained by associating your name, as the owner, with a building designed by architects who are well-established in the market and have been recognized with awards for their efforts and creativity. Likewise, today’s client carefully examines the finishes, the systems, and everything that makes up the building because they ask themselves: okay, will these hold up? Will the value of their investment be maintained and appreciate over the next 10–20 years? This requires very careful calculation. Last, but not least, they look at the developer’s track record. Today, no one simply buys a building anymore; instead, they make a point of finding out information about the developer—what is their track record? What are the safeguards on which the business is based? All these changes reflect, to some extent, the market’s reaction to the real estate scandals of recent years, but that’s not the only factor. There doesn’t have to be any malicious intent involved, but the buyer must be assured that the developer is financially sound, that they will be able to see the project through to completion, and that they can count on someone willing to answer their technical questions, etc. At a time when architecture is beginning to meet ever-increasing demands, the projects I truly believe in are those that manage to combine aesthetic vision with a sense of responsibility toward people and the future. And there’s another advantage—since I’m connected to the reality on the ground, I place great emphasis on sincere and attentive dialogue with the client. I offer a great deal to my clients; I advise investors, and they come to me with pertinent questions regarding the site, spaces, layout, structure, mobility, and so on. Ultimately, quality architecture doesn’t just aim to define a place, but to authentically create value and stand the test of time.